-
NudeCelebForum has been moved from the vBulletin to the XenForo platform. For additional information, see: NCF Moved To XenForo
-
Welcome to the forum!
You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
-
You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!
-
Now available to Registered Users and Senior Members is Celebrity/Supermodel Fake Images, Videos and Gifs pinned at the top of Misc Groups & Shows
General Cleaning
- Thread starter Da' Pimp
- Start date
underground1970
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 879
- Reaction score
- 117
more garbage from underground
Erica Mena – ‘The Perfect Match’ Premiere in Los Angeles
Erica Mena – ‘The Perfect Match’ Premiere in Los Angeles
underground1970
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 879
- Reaction score
- 117
no
Shay Mitchell by Margaret Zhang for Glamour Magazine
Shay Mitchell by Margaret Zhang for Glamour Magazine
Well I understood that rule, it's rather the term 'sex-appeal' that leaves a lot room for interpretation and that is likely the reason for a lot of unwanted posts but also unwanted deletions.
Got a Katherine Heigl picture out of one of the deleted post and while it surely is no grade A picture on the Sex-Scale, having a good look on her Bikini Top is surely enough to cover the term 'sex-appeal', it was also no bad, low-res, double, fake, or any other crap.
Anyhow I glad that the rules about the more liberal because nude only would likely mean 80% of the picture threads could be deleted right away because a lot is sexy but simply not nude.
Sorry if that raised your workload.
Got a Katherine Heigl picture out of one of the deleted post and while it surely is no grade A picture on the Sex-Scale, having a good look on her Bikini Top is surely enough to cover the term 'sex-appeal', it was also no bad, low-res, double, fake, or any other crap.
Anyhow I glad that the rules about the more liberal because nude only would likely mean 80% of the picture threads could be deleted right away because a lot is sexy but simply not nude.
Sorry if that raised your workload.
Oh please, you're making your life hard yourself if you start to judge pics like that. I see KH in a Bikini Top, good view at her funbags = SEXY. It's not even worth thinking about it.
And your description is totally off!
Neither is her husband the focus nor is she "just to make out in the background", if you see it that way you seriously lack any kind of spatial perception.
A too big Granny bra? A Green Bikini Top that covers her funbags like it's appropriate for a star, she's not Miley Cyrus nor some second grade Hollywood wannabe that is desperate to be pictured. -If judge the pictures by what is worn instead of what is shown you somehow miss the point of this board.
And I also don't care what they do or how her expression is. A normal couple on the beach sitting below a sunshade, what do you expect? Often enough these kind of natural behavior gives the best pictures because the stars think they aren't watched.
"Yes. A hairy man in scrappy shorts and a T-shirt. Sexy."
Really if that is your summary of the picture you can deleted 99% of the pictures on this board as the silliness of minor things you mentioned can be found in most pictures.
This is a celebrity forum, if they show their stuff it's usually in a movie, ignoring screencaps all the pictures that we get are simply just sexy but not more.
In case of KH, no nude scenes so we must work with what we get, in the case of KH she is know for her funbags so:
Good view at funbags = PASSED
Learn a selective view, if not for the board then for yourself because you simply waste your time by judging pics by all the crap that surrounds the good portions of a pic.
And your description is totally off!
Neither is her husband the focus nor is she "just to make out in the background", if you see it that way you seriously lack any kind of spatial perception.
A too big Granny bra? A Green Bikini Top that covers her funbags like it's appropriate for a star, she's not Miley Cyrus nor some second grade Hollywood wannabe that is desperate to be pictured. -If judge the pictures by what is worn instead of what is shown you somehow miss the point of this board.
And I also don't care what they do or how her expression is. A normal couple on the beach sitting below a sunshade, what do you expect? Often enough these kind of natural behavior gives the best pictures because the stars think they aren't watched.
"Yes. A hairy man in scrappy shorts and a T-shirt. Sexy."
Really if that is your summary of the picture you can deleted 99% of the pictures on this board as the silliness of minor things you mentioned can be found in most pictures.
This is a celebrity forum, if they show their stuff it's usually in a movie, ignoring screencaps all the pictures that we get are simply just sexy but not more.
In case of KH, no nude scenes so we must work with what we get, in the case of KH she is know for her funbags so:
Good view at funbags = PASSED
Learn a selective view, if not for the board then for yourself because you simply waste your time by judging pics by all the crap that surrounds the good portions of a pic.
F... the bearded dude, what part of "learn a selective view" is unclear?
I would still have taken the picture even if a gorilla sits besides here and she would be holding cow guts instead of her dog.
I glad I still get notifications and can judge myself.
I would still have taken the picture even if a gorilla sits besides here and she would be holding cow guts instead of her dog.
I glad I still get notifications and can judge myself.
Similar threads
