THE MODS HERE ARE ASSHOLES

[stu2906]

commen sence should apply...brook shields did nudity...phoebe gates was 17 in paradise, and fast times at ridgemont high...michelle johnson was 17 in blame it on rio...susan george was 16 in the strange affair...virginie ledoyan was under 18 in the french movie la regle de lhome...all with parents consent in writing, if it was on the "big screen" I dont see what a big deal it is to view, but i do understand from a web owners view..it's better to avoid than test the legal matters.."the clinter"

So if National Geographic or Discovery show pictures of naked tribal kids from africa or some shit with the consent of the parents do we allow that as it has been on mainstream tv. no. there are "mainstream" films where you see similar shit but when it's in a film it's for realism or to show that people in borneo didn't always wear Nike tops and to do it properly sometimes the line gets blurred. but if you put it on the internet as a picture or clip it loses it's context and becomes something else. on a site like this it becomes child porn due to the other content. there is a need to draw a line that line is 18.

cross the line once then you do it again and then there is no lines and you end up with anarchy and an internet chock full of shit for paedo's and frenchmen to watch and wank over.

The End.

 

[rich2rob]

As swede68 said, and clint cannot seem to get into his head, posting pics of underage kids is a criminal offence. Name me a country where its not?. Please don't try to post pics as it won't be you that gets it from the authorities, it will be the owner of the forum, although the owner may me legally required to give your name and location and the vast majority, 99.99% of the membership don't want that to happen. So any you guys who are thinking of posting the pics use that thing called your brain and think of what will happen to this site.

 

[evilrick]

lol this gets me every time...

 

[CASTOR :::]

and?

 

[KABOOM]

No offense to Castor, but I don't want to see the Russian in his pants.

 

[cobalt]

Hello guys

The video featuring Kayden Kross should be still downloadable here.

I no more have the one with Andie Valentino but you can have a taste going there.

About the topic, I've understood that we're not allowed to post pics with hardcore sex.
I hope that posting links to videos is not against the rules.
If not, feel free to moderate this message.

 

[Cman]

you can only post hardcore if the celeb is well known (ex: paris hilton, pam anderson, etc)

Otherwise mods will probably send it to jihad...

actually, never is preferred.

 

[C0BRA]

Nudecelebforum Cleanup Proposal

Short and simple really.

Do not post except the quality naked, damn near naked and just plain sexy ones.

no more fat britney, no more fashion on the red carpet, no more walking the dog in sweats, no more starbucks before makeup, no more morning walks etc etc.

I challenge all the posters to make a name for themselves that says I can click the thread cuz I know it's gonna be good. I'd rather see one good image post a week than a million questionable posts a day.

Every 5+ page thread (ie lohan, spears, hilton, beckinsale, aniston, hurley, theron, kardashian, duff, bell, ferguson, dunst, hewitt, penatteire, biel, aguilera, simpson) could be 1 maybe 2 pages.

who wants every single angle of that ugly dress they wore on the red carpet. 1st post shows the dress and the next 5 show it at every possible different angle. ugh :sad:

sorry for the rant but man.

 

[cobalt]

Hi,

I totally agree with you.
Like you said : it's a NUDE forum

 

[-KA-]

I agree with you, but you gotta admit few red carpet posts are quite revealing and hot (scarlet, kimmy k).

I have posted a lot of those red carpet pics, but I happily announce that I have rapidly decreased the percentage of these kind of posts.

If you post red carpet pics, there should be at least huge cleavege or don't post it. Also not more than 5-6 pics.

If the royals of this great forum banned these pictures completely...that would be even better.

 

[Gatorman]

And, follow the quality over quantity rule...

 

[KABOOM]

brb banning

 

[Cman]

everything works in theory. been trying to do this for years.

 

[C0BRA]

wholly chit did every single 5 page thread I listed get posted in today?

Your right Cman the theory is there and compliments to the chef but now we've got rats in the kitchen.

I have no solutions. I was hoping a thread called "nudecelebforum cleanup" would attract a few of the culprits and turn on the light bulb. maybe it did.

KA, from time to time red carpet pics are ok (5 or 6 prime choice images) and hardly ever great (Alba see through or Scarlett's boob abduction). Never 25 similar images or 3 consecutive posts good. kinda what you said I guess lol

 

[Cman]

yeah, i don't think there should ever be more than 10 images of the same set. when i make galleries for my site, i usually pick out the 5 or 10 best images from each set. no need to have so many.

the basic rule for red carpet pics is skin. the more skin the better. if there is little or no skin, it doesn't need to be posted (unless its see through)

 

[darklordzoidberg]

I am a bit confused after reading this thread.

The one video I had to post contains no nudity, and so I was not going to post it. This is, as is stated in this thread, supposed to be a nude celeb forum.

Then I found similar videos, of the same actress, posted more than a year ago. So decided it would be ok.

Maybe their could be a seperate section for non-nude celebs. After all, their is no nude material on many celebrities.

 

[C0BRA]

is it closer to hot and sexy photoshoot
or
walking an ugly dog to starbucks in a coat and sweat pants with no makeup?

I would say if you are unsure then it's prolly not worth it.

....
Maybe their could be a seperate section for non-nude celebs. After all, their is no nude material on many celebrities.

there is, it's called Jihad or non-nudecelebforum or superiorpics or

 

[darklordzoidberg]

is it closer to hot and sexy photoshoot
or
walking an ugly dog to starbucks in a coat and sweat pants with no makeup?

Closer to the first I would say.

Personally, I prefer a good quality and close to camera video of one of my favourite celebs, in say, a bikini, than a distant and grainy video of that same celebrity in the nude.

 

[rich2rob]

Perhaps,I shouldn't be commenting on this, as I don't post either images or clips, but this is a problem that is ongoing and maybe its time to impose something to discourage this.

I know what I am about to write is extreme, but perhaps a short ban for people who ignore the rules.

 

[Cman]

go to the superficial if you want to see unsexy, unecessary pics of britney spears eating at mcdonalds.

to have a non-nude section would contradict the mission statement of the forum. the reason why there are older non-nude that exist is because we've been struggling with the quality issue since the forum began.

one big problem i notice is big posters who post on multiple celeb forums and they don't even care what the rules are here, because they simply copy and paste the same post on a dozen different forums.

as far as banning goes, i've banned and/or deleted thousands of members, but there are always more noobs that come along to replace them.