• NudeCelebForum has been moved from the vBulletin to the XenForo platform.
    For additional information, see: NCF Moved To XenForo
  • New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!
  • See: Humanitarian Assistance to Ukrainians

Celebrity Videos - cleaned

blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
in that case the only real question remaining would be the form and parameter of the updated posting rule or guideline. The trickiest question of all.
as an example consider this posthttp://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=890103&postcount=20
No one can deny the quality of the set or the allure of both subject and content, but if we were to take this post strictly by skin exposure, most of it would be disallowed.
Similarly this post of mine of Christy Turlington [and you can include several others of her in this thread and also of Ysmeen Ghauri]
http://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=877401&postcount=27
would also be disallowed, but I defy you to tell me it's not one of the sexiest images you're likely to see, clothed or unclothed.
Conversely, most shots of Miley Cyrus are about as sexy as semolina unless you're 15yrs old and have never seen a pair of pubescent manboobs before. So how do we frame our minimum standard? On skin alone would seem to be too crude a measure unless we take your idea of subfora to it's logical conclusion and have similar sections for fashion models and shoots, social media releases etc.
I'm ust throwing ideas at the wall at this point to see if anything sticks. Trying to start a discussion and examination. These aren't firm proposals.
BOC
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
in that case the only real question remaining would be the form and parameter of the updated posting rule or guideline. The trickiest question of all.
as an example consider this posthttp://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=890103&postcount=20
No one can deny the quality of the set or the allure of both subject and content, but if we were to take this post strictly by skin exposure, most of it would be disallowed.
Similarly this post of mine of Christy Turlington [and you can include several others of her in this thread and also of Ysmeen Ghauri]
http://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=877401&postcount=27
would also be disallowed, but I defy you to tell me it's not one of the sexiest images you're likely to see, clothed or unclothed.
Conversely, most shots of Miley Cyrus are about as sexy as semolina unless you're 15yrs old and have never seen a pair of pubescent manboobs before. So how do we frame our minimum standard? On skin alone would seem to be too crude a measure unless we take your idea of subfora to it's logical conclusion and have similar sections for fashion models and shoots, social media releases etc.
I'm ust throwing ideas at the wall at this point to see if anything sticks. Trying to start a discussion and examination. These aren't firm proposals.
BOC
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
That I agree with completely and is along the lines of my thinking too. Most Pap shots are garbage. People wandering through carparks and streets. If you're a fanataic fine, but there are plenty of fora and newsgroups for fanatics. It's the same with red carpet shoots. Endlessly repeated frames of the same old same old. There are some notable exceptions but generally event photos are terribly dull unless the subject is wearing something spectacular.
There were pap shots of one of the Jenners a while back where she was getting into a car or something and was wearing see through leggings. It was like watching a baboon in tights flash its arse at the world and they just kept posting them. I think this is where my deep seated [no pun intended] revulsion of the term "adds" is rooted actually. Had to approve them till finally I started trashing them for adding nothing but it wasn't anything I'd care to include generally and I'd have happily limited it to one post only for "record keeping".
Perhaps that could be a new limitation? Discarding posts that add nothing to previous posts? I've already set some precedents wit that and no one challenged me.
BOC


yakovitch said:
One thing I use as sort of a personal guideline is I think less skin is almost always more acceptable when the images are from a photoshoot... I'm more likely to remove borderline paparazzi pics than ones from an actual photo session. The sexiness factor is much more likely to be present.
Click to expand...
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
That I agree with completely and is along the lines of my thinking too. Most Pap shots are garbage. People wandering through carparks and streets. If you're a fanataic fine, but there are plenty of fora and newsgroups for fanatics. It's the same with red carpet shoots. Endlessly repeated frames of the same old same old. There are some notable exceptions but generally event photos are terribly dull unless the subject is wearing something spectacular.
There were pap shots of one of the Jenners a while back where she was getting into a car or something and was wearing see through leggings. It was like watching a baboon in tights flash its arse at the world and they just kept posting them. I think this is where my deep seated [no pun intended] revulsion of the term "adds" is rooted actually. Had to approve them till finally I started trashing them for adding nothing but it wasn't anything I'd care to include generally and I'd have happily limited it to one post only for "record keeping".
Perhaps that could be a new limitation? Discarding posts that add nothing to previous posts? I've already set some precedents wit that and no one challenged me.
BOC


yakovitch said:
One thing I use as sort of a personal guideline is I think less skin is almost always more acceptable when the images are from a photoshoot... I'm more likely to remove borderline paparazzi pics than ones from an actual photo session. The sexiness factor is much more likely to be present.
Click to expand...
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
Perhaps instead of looking for a new "rule" we should consider the creation of an unofficial consensus "guideline" or "benchmark", for our consultation only rather than general publication, so that all our decisions are more or less in line? This might solve the conundrum of the impossible to formulate rule while at the same time resolving any discrepancy or inequality in our collective decision making.
Then, as you suggested previously, if any of us are confronted by something we can't decide upon, we could bring it here for a consultation-cum-vote and the consensus would decide if it stays or goes.
Might that be a way to resolve this problem?
BOC
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
Perhaps instead of looking for a new "rule" we should consider the creation of an unofficial consensus "guideline" or "benchmark", for our consultation only rather than general publication, so that all our decisions are more or less in line? This might solve the conundrum of the impossible to formulate rule while at the same time resolving any discrepancy or inequality in our collective decision making.
Then, as you suggested previously, if any of us are confronted by something we can't decide upon, we could bring it here for a consultation-cum-vote and the consensus would decide if it stays or goes.
Might that be a way to resolve this problem?
BOC
 
V

Vidman01

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
1,006
Reaction score
3,682
The VERY gorgeous Gloria Guida in 'Quella eta maliziosa', in 720p quality!
Download from my own server or from depositfiles. Enjoy Gloria.



1280x720 / 2:36 / 86 mb:
http://www.nudeactresses.org/free/guida720.rar
or
Dead Link Removed

rar pass: nudeactresses.org

Happy 2016 everybody. Also in the new year, 150 new clips each month on my site!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
I tried it once before if you recall. The result was not ideal.
BOC
 
blueoystercult

blueoystercult

Socially Isolated Since God Was A Boy
Staff Alumn
Joined
Mar 27, 2015
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
318
I tried it once before if you recall. The result was not ideal.
OK. Let's give this a try. All input welcome.
BOC
 
Last edited:
nudografias

nudografias

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2010
Messages
938
Reaction score
81






03:17 - 1280x720 - 53MB
Penélope Cruz in The Counselor (2013).mp4




00:20 - 1280x720 - 7MB
Penélope Cruz in To Rome with Love (2012).mp4




02:42 - 1280x720 - 44 MB
Penélope Cruz in Twice Born (2012).mp4




02:21 - 1280x720 - 38 MB
Penélope Cruz in Broken Embraces (2009).mp4




00:06 - 1280x720 - 1MB
Penélope Cruz in Pirates of the Caribbean On Stranger Tides (2011).mp4




03:02 - 1280x720 - 49MB
Penélope Cruz in Nine (2009).mp4




01:54 - 1280x720 - 38MB
Penélope Cruz in A Matador's Mistress (2009).mp4




03:20 - 1280x720 - 54 MB
Penélope Cruz in Elegy (2008).mp4




00:41 - 640x480 - 5MB
Penélope Cruz in The Good Night (2007).mp4




01:03 - 1280x720 - 16MB
Penélope Cruz in Sahara (2005).mp4




00:57 - 640x480 - 7MB
Penélope Cruz in Don't Move (2004).mp4




00:55 - 1280x720 - 14MB
Penélope Cruz in Blow (2001).mp4




00:27 - 1280x720 - 6 MB
Penélope Cruz in Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001).mp4




01:34 - 1280x720 - 22 MB
Penélope Cruz in Vanilla Sky (2001).mp4




03:04 - 1280x720 - 48 MB
Penélope Cruz in Woman on Top (2000).mp4




00:23 - 640x480 - 2MB
Penélope Cruz in Volavérunt (1999).mp4




01:34 - 640x480 - 12MB
Penélope Cruz in La niña de tus ojos (1998).mp4



01:13 - 1280x720 - 20 MB
Penélope Cruz in Open Your Eyes (1997).mp4




03:21 - 640x480 - 26MB
Penélope Cruz in Jamón, jamón (1992).mp4

​
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Teenmushi
Emma / Em Indica
Replies
6
Views
6K
Teenmushi
Teenmushi
LarryO
  • Locked
  • Sticky
FORUM RULES
Replies
0
Views
4K
LarryO
LarryO
Teenmushi
Hyley Winters
Replies
5
Views
5K
LiCeK
LiCeK
Teenmushi
Lila / Lilah / Lila Love / LilaxoLove
Replies
7
Views
8K
pervmann2000
pervmann2000
Teenmushi
Claire Roos
Replies
9
Views
3K
LiCeK
LiCeK
Top