Celebrity Videos - cleaned

[blueoystercult]

Doesn't "jihading posts other mods have approved" make us all utterly redundant? Are you therefore the arbiter of all?
BOC

I completely agree that there is much too much room for interpretation. I would prefer there be hard and fast rules, but as long as "sexy" is considered acceptable criteria for images to be posted here, we will have problems. One person's sexy is another person's boring. As long as we allow such subjective criteria, we will have issues. And I'm OK with that, since, as I have already said, I am going to continue to Mod the way I think I should, which will mean jihading posts other mods have approved.

Some of the criteria I use includes the amount of appropriate showing, which would include cleavage. I put obvious pokies or c-thru to breasts in that category. I DON'T put c-thru to bra in that category, at least not all the time. And I don't care how sultry and made up a celebrity is, if they are fully clothed or it is only a very attractive head shot, it does not belong. Two-piece swim suits pretty much always fit here. Ditto most underwear/lingerie shots. But regular glamour shots, or candid shots (including red carpets) must show some skin either in cleavage or a VERY high cut leg.

That's largely how I approach my work here.

 

[blueoystercult]

And if the moderator who made the original decision objects to that and reverses it?
BOC

I don't go searching out those kinds of situations. If I stumble on them, I act.

 

[blueoystercult]

Infraction for feberuary: Prohibited File or Image Host

Post: Avril Lavigne
User: feberuary
Infraction: Prohibited File or Image Host
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

prohibited and cash generating image host

Message to User:

I'm sorry but I have penalised your account for posting via links that are not allowed. Please familiarise yourself with the forum rules to prevent further infractions
Thankyou for your attention
BOC

Original Post:

 

[blueoystercult]

With your say being final and your view imposed arbitrarily?
Shouldn't you discuss things with the moderator concerned before you unilaterally decide, in the absence of hard fast rules, what is or is not "acceptable". Doesnt failing to do so denote a complete lack of respect for the views and sensibilities of your fellow moderators?
Forgive me all if being the new boy precludes me from asking these questions. I genuinely just wanted to try to understand better what I was expected to deal with and how. I didn't expect this.
Cheers
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

Rule 05c. "Do not post duplicates of images already posted or fully clothed images or head-shots; images must have 'sex-appeal'.", applies only to Celebrity Pictures, not to Celebrity Videos.

I merged this thread with the 'Hot or Not' moderator discussion thread.

Is there a reason why this rule only applies to one part of the forum and not the other or is that just how things worked out?
Also, isn't there a case to be made for a photo of a major pop star dressed as a $2 whorbe with her ass in the air having 'sex-appeal' [at least to some and using the content/subject of the photo as an example and not the scale/quality]?
What makes the decision to approve that photo wrong and the decision to dump that photo right?
Cheers
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

All of which makes perfect sense to me, not least because I tend to err on the side of approval rather than dismissal. I probably would have OK'd the Rihanna picture even though I find she has all the sex appeal of lettuce because she clearly makes alot of people's days, and though I question the disparity between the video and the image [in this case, but I could easily find as many images too] I certainly would have to respect someone else' decision since it's based on subjectivity. TBH in terms of this board the whole talk show thing and posting every available clip of Friends/Big Bang is utterly beyond me too, but again, some obviously like it so, OK. If my understanding is right,approving material is more about a wide view rather than a narrow personal perspective only.
I'm not sure how that can be reconciled with at least one person arbitrarily overrulling the rest though. That seems to make the rest of us totally redundant at best, and is utterly disrespectful at worst, if we are to accept subjectivity as a rule of thumb.
I don't know what I was expecting when I agreed to give this gig a go, but it wasn't that.
Cheers
BOC

'Sex Appeal' rule was not necessary for Celebrity Videos:
1. Reviewing all videos for 'sex appeal' is not practical.
2. Far fewer videos are posted as compared to mages; threads rarely exceed a few pages. Visitors more easily can locate desired video content than picture content.
3. Video links frequently die; many videos are removed.

I do not think approving the Rhianna image would be 'wrong', only that I probably would have removed it. By now it should be clear that this decision is somewhat subjective. I look for reasons to allow images, not for reasons to remove them.

I only give penalties when images are blatantly un-sexy; I would not have given a penalty to someone posting that image, even if he was an habitual violater.

 

[blueoystercult]

OTB
That's the second time someone has used that set in the last week.

 

[blueoystercult]

Spammer heads up

Just letting you all know we appear to be under a barrage of new members whose only post is a set of images linked to pay redirection sites.

 

[blueoystercult]

Firstly, I'm asking what I consider to be legitimate questions in order to be better able to handle the tasks I have been asked to handle. That's a perfectly rational and sensible thing to do especially in an environment without hard and fast rules on some areas where there is obvious contradiction. Frankly, anyone who doesn't try to understand the full nature of the jobs they are undertaking and the environment in which they are working is a fool.
Secondly, you should, if you possess any kind of courtesy at all, discuss with EVERYONE if they do things you don't grasp or understand or agree with, though I should point out that your sense that you somehow feel able and entitled to overrule their judgement and impose yours over it speaks to an unbridled arrogance.
Apparently, questioning anything that includes one of your decisions is making a mountain out of a molehill, but you have absolutely no problem considering your opinions are more valid than those of others here and arbitrarily imposing those opinions or values at will. That's breathtakingly dictatorial in a community environment.
I have a far better idea. Until such time as subjectivity is no longer the rule of thumb here or you are appointed God of all you survey, you continue to make decisions based on whatever your ideas of correct or incorrect are and leave everyone else's alone.
Have a bit of respect for your peers even if you hold everyone else in contempt.
BOC

First of all, what Larry said! As usual, he nailed it in both of his replies.

Second, IMO, you are making a bit of a mountain out of a mole hill. It is very rare where I jihad an image another mod approves. BOC, I will make a point of discussing with you if I ever see a post you approved that I think doesn't belong. OK?

 

[blueoystercult]

At some point the difference between this and what she generally does will become clear.
No. Not seeing it.
And she still has all the appeal of a Taiwanese ladyboy
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

Unlikely to be a fake

While there have been reports of fakes and of a lawsuit threat against the website Celebrity Jihad [a lawsuit that never materialised, btw] the question of whether or not these are real images is very much in the air. However, since video exists of this shoot and has been posted on this forum twice, and since uncensored versions of the video and still captures have shown up all over the net, it's fair to say it probably is real and that the entire furore was concocted as a publicity stunt not least because the leaks threats and revelations all seem to revolve around the same media groups and people. It's the same publicity strategy Jennnifer Aniston used for years, squealing like a wronged virgin every time she wandered around in a bikini and someone took a photo of it.
Or, as Examiner.com concludes, "Strange how all the major players in these stories are the same...
http://www.examiner.com/article/kate-upton-threatens-lawsuit-over-fake-topless-photos

 

[blueoystercult]

Borderline but approved IMO If we delete this then we have to delete half the content of the celebtrity forum

 

[blueoystercult]

In the first place all I did was ask questions of a group in order to find some clarity. You weighed in and I responded with perfectly reasonable questions based on that. If you go through you will find that I did not "continue to press" (implying that I was making a personal attack) but continued with a discussion, still seeking clarity on my original query, and also making observations about the new issue that arose from those questions:namely your assertion that you by right could "jihad other moderator's posts" but if they did not like that or agree with it, you could then "discuss it". The overtone of a headmaster talking down to a moronic child is unmistakeable.
As you say, too old, and my first internet connection was to Oxford university via one of the first telephone ethernet links from a Commodore PET. The only person who has me beat in internet terms is Tim Berners-Lee. I've been messing around with forums since 9660baud dial up modems were cutting edge and this is most definitely not my first square dance. Every forum has its own way of doing things and I'd be stupid not to try to understand how they work if I am to do a job to the best of my ability. Understanding means asking questions and raising issues if and when they arise and I am unable to decipher them. I was told this was the correct forum to do so, but if one cannot raise issues, point out disparity or question contradiction here then what the hell is the point?
You will note that until that last exchange there was no umbrage at all, and that because while I'm the new boy and acknowledge that status, I'm not an idiot nor a pushover and I have never liked the idea in a community situation of one or two people bulldozing through others. That is simply out of order.
On the ther hand, as a wise man wrote, it's only the internet and not that important in the grander scheme of things.
So. Celebrities with no clothes on. good, eh?
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

It depends very much on whether one finds a middle aged Wednesday Addams sexy or not, doesn't it?

OK, now that I have decided to turn over a new leaf, what do people think of this post:

http://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=868000&postcount=6

The pokies are very subtle and nothing else about the pictures works for us.

Pokies + Pierced Nipple - Carol’ Screening at 2015 BFI London Film Festival


​

 

[blueoystercult]

Did you notice the the magazine page identifies it as Cindy Crawford [Bottom left corner]?

 

[blueoystercult]

It's inevitable for Terry Richardson to shove a macro lens up her to take a close-up of her cervix at some point.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. At this rate of escalation she'll have a scat/water sports video out by 2017

 

[blueoystercult]

Implying that that is a woman?
TAKE THAT BACK!!!

Is this why Playboy isn't showing nude women anymore?

 

[blueoystercult]

Aguilera can sing. Anastacia Newkirk can sing. Amie Miriello can sing. Miley Cyrus is a squawking munter. If she ever puts her cunt away the world will forget her in a heartbeat.

BOC....... You really don't like Ms Cyrus; do you...?? lol.

Each to their own, at least she is more interesting than a shed load of the other bland american vocalists out there, and can actually sing.... she can. lol.

 

[blueoystercult]

She's a talentless ladyboy with a body like a toastrack in a wet paper bag and the face of a constipated bulldog.
Cher may have flashed the crowd, but Cher could sing and act and perform live and while often suggestive, never behaved like a trailer park hooker. Aguilera did a few suggestive things but the pipes on that kid are stellar and in my mind she's up there with some of the greatest soul and jazz singers of all time. She was also strikingly pretty till she fucked up her face with surgery. Dirrty caused an incredible furore and all Auilera did was pair up a bikini with a set of leather chaps and deliever the kind of driving pop track that lives in the back of your head forever. I still rate Back To Basics as one of the best pop albums ever covering all the bases from RnB to power ballad and torch song with equal brilliance
I couldn't hum a Cyrus track if my life depended on it nor name a single one of her albums and to be perfectly blunt I wouldn't fuck her with yours.
You can forgive some people anything if they continue to be brilliant at what they do but the only reason Cyrus gained and maintains fame/infamy is because Hannah Montanna grew up to be a crack whore and all the kiddies moving from childhood to adolescence [and their dads] get to beat off to the slapper from kids TV, and the ONLY reason she's proising to do a show naked is because she knows her 15 minutes are almost up and is scared no one would turn up if she just did a regular gig.
This is how you know girls are smarter than boys.
Robin Thicke sank without trace because all the girls realised he was a useless spineless talentless dick who fancied himself more than any woman could. Boys see Cyrus' gender swap twat and all reason and cognisance are drowned in a tidal wave of drool.
(Rant over. soapbox dismounted)

That's the thing.

Remember when she was an actress?

Remember when she was a celeb that was marketed towards tweens?

Remember when she was a singer?

It's like ever since wrecking ball she's just been trying to go more and more shocking for the attention. She's simulating fucking blow up dolls on stage, getting people in the crowd to grab her crotch, twerking like an idiot against Rovin Thicke.

It's actually weird that she hasn't released any nude selfies or done any nude photoshoots for a few weeks now. But I guess that was just a lull before this fucking retarted concert idea.

 

[blueoystercult]

Actually, I thought it a clever play on words. All things considered it was probably Freudian
(and don't worry. I can't type either)

Fuck I wrote it "retarted"

It's always embarrassing as fuck when my moronic sausage fingers misspell "retarded".