Celebrity Videos - cleaned

[blueoystercult]

Member removed Post removed
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

gost Always posts quality. No rule violations. No hassle. I wish more would follow his lead. Frankly I'm surprised he isn't already a Respected Member.

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 180
Thanked 13,527 Times in 1,425

 

[blueoystercult]

Cool.
Does that mean I finally get to consign Miley Cyrus and all the Kardashian/Jenner tribe to Room 101?
[Incidentally, Room 101 would be my nomination for a reChristened Jihad section. just as final. Not nearly so emotive.]
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

 

[Deleted member 270556]

BTS with Swimsuit Model Hannah Davis (2015)






http://dfiles.eu/files/vbrfthfui
15.8 MB - 1920-1080 - 00:44 - MP4​

 

[blueoystercult]

It's a steep learning curve on this forum. In some areas infractions are very easy to come by. I have one or something admin later said isn't even an infractable offense, and tecnically should have been given at least two more the other day since a] I started an unnecessary thread (one of gost's infractions) and b] the image I posted was, technically, a duplicate (another one gost was penalised for). Besides, picking up infractions for duplicates and threads when you've only been a member for a little while is inevitable. In fact, I just got though having one such decision reversed because I had been working on a new poster trying to show him the ropes whenn he was penalised.
We have posters on here who don't come near to reaching the consistently high standard of gost who are already respected members. He NEVER posts single image social media rips. Always good quality photosets. He's the go to guy for fashion model shoots. He and I have barely exchanged a word and never about anything difficult.
No. You can't discount someone for making simple errors in their first few weeks and months of membership here when their last error was two years ago.

 

[Deleted member 270556]

Kimberley Garner - Behind the Scenes Kimberley London Swimwear Photoshoot (2015)








http://dfiles.eu/files/6gibfdcs8
22 MB - 1920x1080 - 00:47 - MP4​

 

[Deleted member 270556]

Model Rose Bertram Warns Us That She’s Very Bossy (2015)








http://dfiles.eu/files/nz8oaft6x
21.3 MB - 1920x1080 - 01:17 - MP4​

 

[blueoystercult]

Ah. That would be my point from a while back about people now posting every bloody frame in a clip so there's no need to download the sodding video.
But whet the hell do I know?
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

"L-Word" Promoshoot


Replacing lost image with significant upgrades

 

[blueoystercult]

Maximum Warrior Launch a

SupperClub LA 10-12-2010


Shush. I'm thinking...

 

[blueoystercult]

Now, don't you hold back. Bottling things up like that is bad for your blood pressure

 

[blueoystercult]

http://www.nudecelebforum.com/showpost.php?p=889647&postcount=859

​

The one we deleted of her big fat minging face because it showed nothing but her big fat minging face was even more obnoxiously large than this. It took up the entire flipping panel width wise and meant this one post filled an entire page. There really is only so much Kardashian even the strongest stomach can take.
Suggestion
06d. Do not post full sized images larger than 300x300 pixels* in content threads.
06e. Do not post more than one full sized image of 300x300 pixels* or less in any one post.
*size used as example. Actual size would be discussed and decided upon according to tecnical and aesthetic imperatives.
Some hosts don't offer the option of very small thumbs. I have this problem with SNXS where their smallest option is 236px wide and retains aspect ratio. There is nothing that can be done about that at all. The reason I keep using them is they are staggerngly stable, don't delete from active accounts and my ISP doesn't block them. That being said, I've never posted anything this bloody big directly to the forum!

BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

I'd agree that a rethink of the policy of looking for a way to approve all posts is in order, mainly because so much social media junk is finding its way here and we are drowning in b-roll "adds" that really add nothing.
That being said, I'm loathe to embark on a wholesale and draconian crackdown without a clear consensus of what is or is not acceptable. If we are not careful it will cease to be moderation and become instead internet bullying that will suck all the enjoyment, and so the life, out of this forum. No one wants that.
As I see it one of our biggest problems is consistency because so much is subjective. As such we must educate ourselves in collective standards of judgement before we can adequately and consistently moderate. My judgement is different to Yak's, Yak's is different to Selene's, Selene's is different to mine and so on. If we don't agree with an approval or removal it's not really nice to countermand that judgement, but we have not created an opportunity to raise these things collectively or without the possibility of rancour.
We have this thread for discussion, but because we are discussing policy it is not being used to discuss the standards of individual posts and that's where we need to go now.
I would suggest in the first place therefore a moderator only permanent or "sticky" thread for this, either here or in the "Jihad" section (I'd still like to rename that something less emotive and bloody offensive!), to be used as a holding tank for questionable posts for the picture moderators to consider as a group. Those posts could then be restored to their original thread or removed altogether once consensus is reached. That way they are kept away from the forum proper in a space where it is not reliant on all being online together but where they won't be lost amidst the detritus of obvious crap. The objective would be to have the section clear and empty at least once a week. We're all smart enough and grown up enough to discuss these things like adults. Eventually we'll just know whether something meets this collectively decided standard because we'll have arrived at it as a group, so we won't need to do this anymore and we will have eliminated the wild disparity between decisions that is both confusing and unfair to posters.
One added bonus of this section would be to help new moderators. When I first took up the post I had no idea beyond my own taste what was or was not right and no one could give me a definitive answer. someone else coming into the position would have a collective assistance and a set of standards that we have arrived at as a group. That has to be a good thing. No?
BOC

 

[blueoystercult]

Infraction for goodbay: Comments In Content Threads

Post: Morgan Saylor
User: goodbay
Infraction: Comments In Content Threads
Points: 1

Administrative Note:

Why you have just been warned

Message to User:

This is a very obvious fake. You can see the join around the face and hairline.
Be more careful please.
BOC

Original Post:

Morgan Frances Saylor (born October 1994) is an American actress. She is known for portraying Dana Brody on the Showtime series Homeland from season one to three.[4] Along with the rest of the cast of Homeland, Saylor was nominated for the Screen Actors Guild Award for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series in 2013 and 2014.

 

[blueoystercult]

actually it was cash generating spam and I dumped his arse.

 

[blueoystercult]

God Save Queens! 2015 Campaign

ph Lukasz Zietek

 

[blueoystercult]

Maxim Online bikini set 2002

replacing annd upgrading previous posts

 

[blueoystercult]

Femme (France) 1990

"Maille Fair Lady"

 

[blueoystercult]

The above image and this one are leaks from the shoot set of Maxim Feb 2016. It is my understanding that Hosk has the cover.