somasharma
Senior Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2012
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 120
Sorry wrong post









My two cents which, I know, probably isn't worth half that these days, but my initial reaction is that this is a way of complicating things, not simplifying. I agree that there are some cases where there are a lot of individual SM posts that lengthen threads, but I don't think that's a big deal. They are all still, ostensibly, static images of celebrities. Personally, when I am looking through threads as an end user, I look for the celebrities I am most interested in and check out the latest posts. It doesn't bother me that I have to scroll through a handful of SM posts, and I would rather do that than have to look at a second sub-thread for SM posts.
Just to throw some gasoline on the fire - I've gotta ask... just how nefarious does Imagetwist have to get before they're banned as a host? They're already the most aggressive ad-pumping piece of shit allowed here; makes me wonder how we can justify banning other, much less invasive, hosts.


