• New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Customize your forum experience with the xenForo-G-1-0 browser script.
    For additional information, see: Useful Custom Forum Script: xenForo-G-1-0
  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!
  • See: Humanitarian Assistance to Ukrainians

Celebrity Videos - cleaned

Dolce & Gabbana, Milan, 2000

Ph: Gian Paolo Barbieri
These are the ads from which the above gag was lifted


And this is a decent scan of a 6x4 transparency copy used for print (things were a bit different in the industry 16 years ago)


Apart from it being tricky to find copies of this quality, which is surprising considering the shoot, what I'm struggling to understand is what D&G were trying to sell with the shots.
 
Warning for swhere: Comments In Content Threads

Post: Karina Jelinek
User: swhere
Infraction: Comments In Content Threads
Points: 0

Administrative Note:
Why you have just been warned
Click to expand...


Message to User:
Leaving aside the fact that these images, confirming identity, are available on Zimbio, MoeJackson,theblemish and other low end gossip sites, which you clearly didn't bother to check before weighing in, your one and only post is to break one of our biggest rules and post a comment in the content thread.
Rocket Science.
We're happy when people spot things we don't and delighted to answer questions or queries, but in the future if you want to report a post use the report button and if you want to discuss something take it to the discussion section where you can yak to your heart's content.
Above all please pay us the courtesy and respect of reading forum rules and following them.
uture breaches will not be dealt with so leniently
Thankyou for your attention
BOC
Click to expand...


Original Post:
Not even close to her....
Click to expand...
 
CC

This image has been the subject of much debate but with honours even on yea and nay, thus far no one has had a copy of the "original" to prove the image is faked
Do you have the "original" image or are you just voicing your opinion?
BOC
 
Infraction for sexcat: Starting a threads & duplicating a number of posts in the existing thread.

Post: rita ora new nude photo 2016
User: sexcat
Infraction: Starting a threads & duplicating a number of posts in the existing thread.
Points: 2

Administrative Note:
Why
Click to expand...


Message to User:
Four new threads. Four. All containing images in part at least already present. Which means you didn't bother to read the rules, you didn't bother to look for existing threads to add to and you didn't bother to check whether you were duplicating content.
Which means you don't give a toss about how this place works or why.
If you want to contribute you're welcome to, but do us the courtesy of reading these
http://www.nudecelebforum.com/announcement.php?f=7&a=5
and paying them and us the basics of attention and respect.
BOC
Click to expand...


Original Post:



​
Click to expand...
 
Note to posters in the Pictures section

A bunch of selfies taken on a mobile phone or webcam does NOT constitute a "photoshoot".
BOC
 
Reply sent to poster.

blueoystercult said:
05c of the forum Rules states "Do NOT post duplicates of images already posted or fully clothed images or head-shots; images must have 'sex-appeal'"

So far today you have posted shots that have focused on the men (and no, Heigl in the background wearing her granny's bra is not enough to keep it. It's a photo primarily of her half naked husband). Shots that show absolutely nothing at all and are just high end fashion shoots about the clothes not the women inside them. Pap shots of Bella Thorne in a pair of slacks and a crop top are not enough to keep them. Piss poor enlargments of an existing post by another member (though to your credit you didn't try to claim they were "upgrades").
As for these. In all honesty they got swept away with the flotsam because one of your Imagetwist uploads opened so many popunders it was like coming under fire from a mailbom and my browser crashed.
I originally intended to replace the links with something non invasive When I restored the browser the box must have stayed checked so when I removed the other trash that one went to.
I have absolutely no bloody clue who it is. Her talent has made that much of an impression. If you want them on the board you have two choices. Reupload them on this godawful site and hope to Christ They don't do this again, or upload them to a neutral host that isn't invasive.
But be aware if they make my browser crash again I won't bother replacing the links I will junk them
BOC
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Teenmushi
Lila / Lilah / Lila Love / LilaxoLove
Replies
14
Views
13K
xericx
X
Teenmushi
Satine Summers
Replies
6
Views
7K
Misspussycat
Misspussycat
Teenmushi
Harley King
Replies
8
Views
4K
LiCeK
LiCeK
Teenmushi
Kinsley Kane
Replies
4
Views
5K
smokinghotNC
S
Teenmushi
Sophia Sultry
Replies
1
Views
4K
Teenmushi
Teenmushi
Top