• New threads will not be visible until approved by a moderator.
  • Customize your forum experience with the xenForo-G-1-0 browser script.
    For additional information, see: Useful Custom Forum Script: xenForo-G-1-0

  • Welcome to the forum!
    You must activate your account in order to post and view all forum content
    Please check your email inbox & spam folders for our activation email, then follow the link to validate your email address.
    Contact Us if you are having difficulty posting or viewing forum content.
  • You are viewing our forum as a guest, with limited access.
    By joining you will gain full access to thousands of Videos, Pictures & Much More.
    Membership is absolutely FREE! Registration is FAST & SIMPLE.
    Register Today to join the first, most comprehensive and friendliest communities of nude celebrity fans on the net!

Future of Politics

You sir are right, it is a big deal. He is in the top 5 biggest robot makers, and just as fake as the other 4. Whoever they may be. Do you know what the difference is between dishonest and fake? About 1000 miles. Fatass fatty fat fake.
 
minnie, please consider taking your own advice... i DO think for myself, and if you read what i post here, and if you were at all familiar with rush, you would see some rather stark differences... i learned to think for myself many years ago... i can tell you from experience that it is rather refreshing... you should try it sometime...

its a funny thing, really... you consider everything on the table, and eventually come to a conclusion... if anyone else shares that conclusion, the ignorant in society make an assumption that the thinking was done by someone else... care to tell us why that is?? because i (or you) agree with something someone says does not mean that i (or you) came to that conclusion BECAUSE of that other person...

consider for a moment that rush has a weekly audience of roughly 20-25 million... i am willing to bet that there are millions of folks in the US that agree with him on a majority of issues that have NEVER even heard his show, and possibly never heard of him at all... al franken has an audience of dozens, and i know that not all of them are on this forum... does everyone that agrees with franken do so because they are incapable of forming an independant thought?? think about it...
 
cartman,

I used to listen to lumbaugh many years ago and found some of what he had to say interesting. The problem was that he would occasionally speak of something that I had direct info on and his conclusions were rediculous and 180 deg. opposite of what actually was going on. Hence, his info and conclusions were deceptive. Seen enough of that, don't need any more.
 
You knew info that he couldn't get a hold of? Let me guess, global warming? How'd i know?:)
 
Iceberg said:
Well, I'd sooner trust mindido than that "Big Fat Idiot," especially on that topic.

As for another topic, it looks like American (at least Kansan) students will be worse in the sciences than students from Gambia:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/EDUCATION/11/08/evolution.debate.ap/index.html

Does it eat you up knowing that long after your kids kids have passed away, that every president will have believed in god thus hampering what they could have been? Or do you hope that a fake will come along and just pretend he believes in god for possible election? Would that be fine? Just curious
 
Duke,

Duke E. Pyle said:
You knew info that he couldn't get a hold of? Let me guess, global warming? How'd i know?:)

I don't remember precisely what issues that I found lumbaughs info to be inaccurate as I quit listening to him at least 8 to 10 years ago. At that time I was partially studying environmental issues so I would have a tendency to believe my P.H.D. professors (that had extensively studied a particular subject for many years) over a blowhard that doesn't even have a college degree.

I would think that most educated individuals would do the same.
 
Duke E. Pyle said:
Does it eat you up knowing that long after your kids kids have passed away, that every president will have believed in god thus hampering what they could have been? Or do you hope that a fake will come along and just pretend he believes in god for possible election? Would that be fine? Just curious

Belief in God has no basis for reasoned judgment on matters not of faith or, perhaps, morality. An example of this is the sciences, where faith plays no role, but facts are what decide matters.

God gave us all brains and He expected that we would use them. Intelligent Design is a façade of creationism, the fundamentalist idea of which has been disproven beyond a reasonable doubt. (The Earth is not barely over 6000 years old.)

http://www.boston.com/news/world/eu...rdinal_asks_faithful_not_to_discount_science/
 
I don't see why this link has excited you so much. I believe that the "extreme" in you is taking over not allowing you to decipher bullshit and common sense. I mean come on.... DUH comes to mind? :mrgreen:
 
berg, naturally kids educated in government schools will end up dumber than most of the world... look at who has had control of the schools for decades... we now care more about self esteem and feelings than the right answer to a question... nope, no surprise there, but its folks that think the way you do that have brought this terrible fate down upon the children of this nation....

if the education of kids in this country is to ever get better, two things need to be brought back, and the sooner, the better... risk and shame are the two things i am talking about... some kids manage to graduate high school without ever taking any sort of risk, or ever being injured physically or emotionally... that kid is a huge liability to anyone near him or her... one should not experience the first inkling of pain from a scrape, or the first insult, at age 20something... that is best gotten out of the way in early childhood, where lessons can be learned and remembered... some things hurt, and some people can be mean sometimes... shame is the other key... it is gone, in the interest of self esteem... with shame, there is an incentive to work harder and do well to avoid the NEED for shame... with no shame, every answer, right or wrong, is "good enough," which leads to the kids of upper iguana scoring better on tests than American kids...
 
What pisses me off about this, is that she was never a covert op, she was a damn weapons analysts. Kinda of hard to break a law when one doesn't exist for disclosing public knowledge.
 
Tex,

Apparently, her status as a covert op. is not really much of a matter of debate any longer (except for Bush/Cheney apologists). The law, as I understand it, covers almost everyone that works for the CIA. She had been working as a covert op. for some period of time, but, at the time of Novak's article, she was working a desk job (fairly important one at that). If her cover had not been blown, there was a possibility that she could have gone covert at some time in the future.

I believe that is the problem area.
 
her cover wasnt blown, she was not covert, and no laws were broken... conveniently absent from this discussion is one reporter named bob woodward, who apparently was, against the rules of his newspaper, collecting information for a book he was writing... word is, he knows a few things that might just kill the case against libby... tough to convict people when there was no crime... oh, and for the record, as i am sure all of you know, an indictment is not a conviction... i predict that the case against libby will be dismissed...
 
Man,

How can someone say so much and be so wrong about everything. Oh, thats right, its lumbaugh.
 
endymion,

Good question! Seems like just another reason the US reputation continues to fall with the rest of the world.
 
The UN idiots wanted free un supervised access to the terrorists so that they could talk to them in private. Those sorry bastards have it better now than they did living in caves and picking sand fleas off their nuts.
 
endy, if some nation feels compelled to run a jailbreak op at gitmo, they are welcome to try... meanwhile, what business does the un have with people staying at club gitmo?? some access was offered, but the un turned it down... that organization grows increasingly irrellevent with each passing minute... a great club for talking a lot and doing absolutely nothing... the un has no teeth whatsoever, and as it is impotent and irrelevent, should be disbanded...

micro, no one has ever explained to me the value, tangible, that having a good worldwide reputation brings... personally, i dont much care what other nations think about the US... even IF we bent over backwards and did everything we could to make the rest of the world like us, it wouldnt work... things are just too good in this country, and most of the world will dislike us anyway... so tell me, what is the downside to having a bad worldwide rep, and what would the tangible benefits of having a good rep be?? also, im curious, what, exactly, could the US do that would improve its reputation??

tex, instead of prayer rugs, korans, and an arrow pointing to mecca, all guests should recieve a free football, and an open invitation to the pork buffet...

oh, i almost forgot... two former guests at gitmo were CAUGHT IN THE ACT OF TERRORISM in morocco... can anyone tell me why letting those folks go is a good idea??
 
I'm not saying let them go, that would be nuts.
Chances are most of these guys are psycho terrorists you wouldn't want wandering around your neighbourhood. But EVERYBODY has to be accountable for their treatment of prisoners. The US has given themselves the power to hold people alomst indefinitely without trial, or even charging them. If other countries did this, it'd be screamed about. What if Canada set up the same deal, and arrested (indefinitely) every American that entered Canada? "We think they're terrorists, eh?"
And yes I get the difference in my idea to the actuallity. But if you refuse to report to the UN, then there is NO-ONE to answer to for anything. In which case, the fucked-up people in any conutry will just keep getting worse, because they start to think they too can get anyway with whatever they like, as the US seems to think.
cable, having a really good rep is not necessarily a great thing, you don't want to be a pushover. But having an extremely bad rep just makes your country more of a target, and nobody wants that. Mistreat one person, and the enemy grows in numbers as people get pissed off. I don't care if they are mistreating terrorists, but the US government needs to ensure people outside their country think they're still playing fair.
 
Top