- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
- Messages
- 1,930
- Reaction score
- 318
Images now restored
BOC
BOC
blueoystercult said:05c of the forum Rules states "Do NOT post duplicates of images already posted or fully clothed images or head-shots; images must have 'sex-appeal'"
So far today you have posted shots that have focused on the men (and no, Heigl in the background wearing her granny's bra is not enough to keep it. It's a photo primarily of her half naked husband). Shots that show absolutely nothing at all and are just high end fashion shoots about the clothes not the women inside them. Pap shots of Bella Thorne in a pair of slacks and a crop top are not enough to keep them. Piss poor enlargments of an existing post by another member (though to your credit you didn't try to claim they were "upgrades").
As for these. In all honesty they got swept away with the flotsam because one of your Imagetwist uploads opened so many popunders it was like coming under fire from a mailbom and my browser crashed.
I originally intended to replace the links with something non invasive When I restored the browser the box must have stayed checked so when I removed the other trash that one went to.
I have absolutely no bloody clue who it is. Her talent has made that much of an impression. If you want them on the board you have two choices. Reupload them on this godawful site and hope to Christ They don't do this again, or upload them to a neutral host that isn't invasive.
But be aware if they make my browser crash again I won't bother replacing the links I will junk them
BOC
I did hear that it was a body double for the above post...
Nope, saw her tell the story behind the scene in a tv interview. It's her.
Nope, saw her tell the story behind the scene in a tv interview. It's her.
Why you have just been infracted
Not just a comment, which I would let go from a newbie, but a whole bloody discussion which SHOULD have been moved where I moved the entire bloody lot myself.
Then, to cap it off, I find another newbie, IgnatiusJ., was smart and considerate enough to read the forum rules and took the discussion there himself.
THAT is the example you should follow. It's not about pedantry. It's about the rules of te pen you want to play in that have evolved for a reason.
BOC
Nope, saw her tell the story behind the scene in a tv interview. It's her.
Here's an article talking about and how her husband encouraged it
http://www.inquisitr.com/1783010/me...in-the-bronze-may-shock-big-bang-theory-fans/
Why you have just been infracted
Not just a comment, which I would let go from a newbie, but a whole bloody discussion which SHOULD have been moved where I moved the entire bloody lot myself.
Then, to cap it off, I find another newbie, IgnatiusJ., was smart and considerate enough to read the forum rules and took the discussion there himself.
THAT is the example you should follow. It's not about pedantry. It's about the rules of te pen you want to play in that have evolved for a reason.
BOC
I did hear that it was a body double for the above post...
Nope, saw her tell the story behind the scene in a tv interview. It's her.
Why you have just been infracted
Not just a comment, which I would let go from a newbie, but a whole bloody discussion STARTED by a senior member which SHOULD have been moved where I moved the entire bloody lot myself.
Then, to cap it off, I find another newbie, IgnatiusJ., was smart and considerate enough to read the forum rules and took the discussion there himself.
THAT is the example you should follow. It's not about pedantry. It's about the rules of te pen you want to play in that have evolved for a reason.
BOC
I did hear that it was a body double for the above post...
Why you have just been infracted
You couldn't be bothered to scroll back on the same page to check. I forgive most duplicates on huge threads because it's hard to check and easy to miss but this? 10 posts above.
No
BOC