Am I correct in saying that TNA have also got Rob Van Dam lined up for Monday aswell?
Personally, I think WWE should have called in The Rock for Monday night. The Rock would be significantly better than Bret in terms of entertainment value. Bret is a sour man, whose character is so 2D nowadays that it doesn't matter what position you put him in anymore, the Screwjob is all that he will ever be known for (which is a sad thing really, as he has had a lot more to offer).
Due to his insurance claim with Lloyds of London, he can never, ever become physically involved, so we already know before RAW even airs, that he will confront HBK/Vince/HHH, but no matter what is said, no one will hurt anyone (DX VS The Dynasty = Main Event? Bret refs from outside and "screws" DX? Terribly idea, but likely).
The Rock on the other hand, is so upbeat and quick-witted. You can quite literally throw him in the ring or on camera with any other wrestler and he will make a show of that character, plus it also gives an opportunity for some of the older run-ins (ie; bumping into Hurricane "Hamburglar" Helms, and other people). He is truly a hilarious person, as displayed during his Hall Of Fame appearance not too long ago.
The last time we seen The Rock, he stated that he would be guest hosting. It then surfaced on the net the following day, that he would do it in January 2010, so I have no idea why WWE didn't call him in on this crucial night.
Personally, I think it will take a lot more than Hogan to make me tune into TNA. Hogan is not who he once was, and with all the bad media and press coverage he's getting these days, I don't know why TNA went after him in the first place.
Can you imagine how many unknown, athletic wrestlers, or ex-WWE mid-carders TNA could've signed for the same money they're gonna pay to have Hogan there? Crazy move on TNA's part.